Monster Beats Kopfhorerde Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:39:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Monster Beats Kopfhorerde 32 32 Goldman Sachs spin-off Juven to support high-growth African companies with big checks – TechCrunch Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:01:46 +0000

Mauritius and UK investment firm Juven went live today with plans to fund growing tech and consumer companies in Africa.

The one-year-old company is looking to invest big checks in companies “that have proven business models, strong revenue traction and large addressable markets,” she said in a statement..

Juven is one of the few investment firms targeting growth deals on the continent, including TLcom, Novastar and Partech Africa, which have issued large checks to tech companies in recent years.

But unlike the others, the Juven is not a venture capital fund; The evergreen investment firm is a spinoff of Goldman Sachs’ core team for Africa, responsible for several high-growth investments in the tech scene since 2014.

Juven’s founder Jules Frebault led this team (also known as the Special Situations Group). He joined Goldman Sachs in 2010 and developed the department’s strategy from a Johannesburg office to support companies that could make good returns on the continent..

The team initially made some investments in private equity and credit; the most notable bets were in companies and telecom-led towers like the IHS towers.

Ultimately, Goldman Sachs got hold of growth stage investments in tech companies, supporting the first African unicorn Jumia, Zipline, and Eat’N’Go. He also led investments in Unicaf Series B, Jumo Series B Second, Kobo360 Series A and Twiga Foods Series B.

Frebault told TechCrunch that the Juven team has moved away from Goldman Sachs to “seize the opportunity of the growth phase in Africa with a dedicated structure, capital, resources and mandate.. ”

Thereby, Goldman Sachs has moved its growth portfolio – Unicaf, Jumo, Kobo360, Twiga and Eat’N’Go – to Juven. Some former Goldman Sachs employees also left with Frebault to develop Juven’s operations.

The company is structured to have a holding company and a balance sheet that holds its assets in cash. So when an investment is monetized, the capital returns and the Juven redeploys it. Such methods make it possible to various investments without raising dedicated funds.

“It’s actually similar to a business in terms of how it’s structured, ”said Frebault. “And the capital we deploy comes either from our balance sheet or from follow-up investments by our shareholders.

With this in mind, Juven has reinvested this year in four companies in its current portfolio. Although he plans to add more investments before the end of next year, Frebault says the company might not make more than three investments per year..

The average ticket size will range from $ 10 million to $ 30 million, then $ 50 million or more in follow-up checks. The founder says that for tech companies, which is one of Juven’s primary targets, he targets the Series B and later stage growth cycles.

Since Juven only makes a handful of investments per year, the company will provide Additional advantages around financial, legal, operational and strategic support.

“We have to be flexible and start at $ 10 million because that may be the right size for Serie B rounds on the continent,” Frebault said. “We don’t take a venture capital approach and we don’t invest in a lot of companies. We take concentrated positions and then continue to invest in these companies over time. “

La Juven is focused on entrepreneurs trying to leverage technology to solve access issues for the masses, the company said. Frebault adds that the Juven may also consider non-tech companies that may solve such problems.

Although the company says it can invest in almost anything, companies that solve problems related to food, education, health, financial services, trade and logistics will likely get a sign head before the others..

“We can invest in anything, but we stay away from extractive industries,” said the founder.

It is the same situation with countries as the investment firm has a preference for expanding businesses at regional level in major consumer economies such as Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, South Africa, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire.

Even though the team that led Goldman Sachs’ investments in Africa are now Juvenile, Frebault says the 152-year-old Asset Management division of the investment giant still has a global mandate that includes Africa. , although focusing on larger scale and institutional activity.

Goldman Sachs declined to comment on Frebault’s decision, the Juven’s activity, its own goals or broader plans for the region going forward.

Source link

]]> 0
The inconsistent ethics of whale research Wed, 06 Oct 2021 07:04:20 +0000

Item body

Almost 40 years after a majority of the member states of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) voted in 1982 to end commercial whaling indefinitely, whaling continues, although to a lesser extent everything like scientific research using the products of this hunt. And according to a new study, that research is not limited to scientists in whaling countries: Researchers from countries whose governments boast anti-whaling policies are also working with whaling companies to procure meat, tissue and other products. whaling products for research.

The study authors reviewed 35 peer-reviewed articles and conference abstracts describing research relying on Icelandic whaling products since 2003, when that country resumed whaling after an 11 hiatus. years. They argue that their findings underscore “the need to improve ethical guidelines for whale research involving samples or data from controversial sources such as Icelandic whaling.”

Of the 59 institutions involved in the research identified in the study, almost half were from four countries: Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries supported the 1982 vote and formally opposed the fact that when Iceland resumed whaling in 2003, it did so after joining the IWC. Of the articles reviewed by the authors, about half were partially funded by government grants from one or more of these countries.

The purpose of the article is not to name and shame individual scientists who use the products of whaling in their research. Instead, study co-author Vassili Papastavrou of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, who wrote the article with independent whale researcher Conor Ryan and Peter Sand at LMU Munich in Germany, argues that The thicket of ethical and legal issues surrounding whaling is too entangled to expect individual scientists to navigate on their own.

“There are a whole bunch of international laws regarding whales and the decisions that have been made, and these are beyond the competence of the average academic,” Papastavrou insists. “We don’t say what’s right or wrong. We are not the arbitrators. But there really is a need for an appropriate set of ethical guidelines to help everyone involved determine what to do. “

The problem is more than just an inconsistency, says Hal Whitehead, a biologist and whale specialist at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia who was not involved in the study. While some researchers may excuse the use of the proceeds of whaling on the grounds that these whales were going to be killed anyway, their very involvement could make future whaling more likely, he says.

“It is a problem when the science that is done on the products of whaling is used to justify whaling,” he says.

Two guidelines, Papastavrou argues, would prevent a situation in which governments with anti-whaling policies fund research that is based on the whaling they oppose.

On the one hand, says Papastavrou, “I think any government funding should require an appropriate ethical review of the nature of research. And is what you are proposing to do legal in your own country? The latter, he argues, would align this research with the standards set over the past decades by the medical research community, which now prohibits the outsourcing of medical trials to countries with less stringent regulations. Further, he and his co-authors cite a guideline from the American Medical Association that states, “If unethical experimental data can be replaced with ethically researched data and achieve the same goals, then it must. be done.

One of the scientists whose work was included in the analysis, Alex Aguilar of the University of Barcelona in Spain, questions what he sees as the hypothesis of Papastavrou and his colleagues of a consensus according to which commercial whaling is unethical. Aguilar argues that commercial whaling “is a perfectly acceptable activity for many IWC member countries”.

Aguilar also points out that the Society for Marine Mammalogy’s guidelines for the treatment of marine mammals in field research state that, to the extent possible, activities such as hunting “should be used as a source of material for scientific studies of marine mammals”.

In contrast, another researcher whose work has been cited by Papastavrou and colleagues says he thinks there should be “more ethical guidelines instituted by journals as well as professional societies.”

The researcher, who asked not to be named for fear of embarrassing or unintentionally messy colleagues, was previously drawn to the idea that using meat and tissue samples to obtain data on whale biology could potentially lead to better conservation efforts.

More recently, however, his position has changed. “Aided not only by my own awareness and evolution as a researcher, but also by a radical change in scientific methods and perspective, I am now much less comfortable using such fabrics of dubious provenance than ever before. previously. Not only would I no longer use such fabrics, but I would be happier if no one did. “

Source link

]]> 0
SHERIFF SALE BY VERTU | Legal notices Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000

SHERIFF SALE UNDER a writ of execution issued by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Cape May County, pending DOCKET No. F-008083-19, in which STURDY SAVINGS BANK is the plaintiff and WILLIAM LLOY, D JR., ET AL are the Defendants, I will be exhibiting for sale in a public place on: WEDNESDAY, DAY 3 OF NOVEMBER 2021 at 1 p.m. at the Courthouse located at 9 North Main Street ( Rte. 9) at Cape May Court House, New Jersey, described as follows: All that lot, parcel or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, ‘sutuate, being and being in TOWNSHIP OF DENNIS, County of CAPE MAI and State of New Jersey. 1944 ROUTE 9 NORTH, CLERMONT, NJ 08214 LOT 7 IN BLOCK 262 Dennis Township, Cape May County, New Jersey DIMENSIONS: 240 ‘X 1599’ (8.75 ACRES) NEAREST CROSS STREET: ROUTE 9 AND CLERMONT DRIVE Description above does not constitute a complete legal description, said complete legal description is attached to this certain mortgage registered at the Cape May County Register / Clerk’s office on February 6, 2008, in Mortgage Book 4704, page 263, file no. 544, and the writ of execution on the with the Cape May County Sheriff. This sale includes the guarantee in which the applicant has obtained security in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code. The “warranty” is specifically described as: comprising all furniture, fixtures, equipment, appliances, inventory, supplies, etc. and all other guarantees as described in the guarantee contract and the financing statements filed now or hereafter attached to, or used in connection with the premises in question. This sale is carried out in accordance with article 9 of the UCC, including, but not limited to, article § 9-610. The following is the amount owed on September 15, 2021 for the pre-foreclosure obligations of the mortgage in this case. it is the responsibility of the purchaser at Sheriffs Sale to pay these bonds, Previous Mortgage (s): None Previous Judgment (s): None Municipal Bonds: Taxes (approx.): 40,245.94 $. plus interest and penalties, if applicable. In addition, taxes in the amount of $ 4,916.21 are payable on November 1, 2021. Sewer: N / A – Septic water: N / A – Well The sale is subject to all unpaid taxes, water, sewer and municipal privileges or tax, which can be delinquent. You must check with the tax / water / sewer collector for the exact amounts due. An independent investigation can determine whether or not unpaid interest remains recorded and / or takes precedence over the mortgage lien being foreclosed and, if so, the current amount owed on it. If the sale is canceled for any reason whatsoever, the purchaser during the sale will only be entitled to the refund of the deposit paid. The purchaser will have no other recourse against the mortgagor, mortgagee or agent of the mortgagee. Excess Money: If after the sale and settlement of the mortgage debt, including fees and expenses, there is any excess money, the money will be deposited into the Superior Court Trust Fund and any claimant the excess, or part thereof, may file a petition under Court Rules 4: 64-3 and 4: 57-2 indicating the nature and extent of that person’s claim and requesting an order ordering payment of excess money. The sheriff or anyone else making the sale will have information regarding the surplus, if any. The amount owing under the judgment is $ 1,918,801.93 plus interest, fees and sheriff’s fees. At time of sale cash, certified check, cashier’s check or treasurer’s check in the amount of 20 percent of the offer price is required. The Sheriff reserves the right to adjourn any sale without further notice of publication. All publication costs are the responsibility of the applicant. COOPER LEVENSON PA 1125 ATLANTIC AVENUE ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 08401 Sheriff number: CH756674 BOB NOLAN, SHERIFF Printing costs: $ 198.40 # 0000173533 Publication dates: October 6, 13, 20 and 27, 2021

Source link

]]> 0
small reading initiative follows the law of the name of the late Steve Carter | Education Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:30:00 +0000

Although well below what the friends of the late Steve Carter are aiming for, state education superintendent Cade Brumley has said he plans to use $ 40 million in federal stimulus dollars in part to tackle Louisiana’s dismal reading problem.

Brumley said the state’s Department of Education clearly lacked the funds to fund a 2021 bill named after Carter, a former state official and champion of student reading who died of complications from COVID-19 last January.

The measure, House Bill 85, offers students in Kindergarten to Grade 5 reading problems up to $ 1,000 a year for expert help.

Without a dissenting vote, the Louisiana legislature approved a push to reduce the staggering number of young students who cannot read and name …

However, the annual bill is $ 159 million, and the legislature has failed to provide a means to fund the ambitious program.

Brumley said he was launching “our version” of the bill which would provide one-to-one lessons to qualified families for children with math or English difficulties.

Families would receive vouchers to be able to hire tutors of their choice.

“We are working on the legal processes to put this in place,” he said in a recent meeting with the editorial board of The Advocate.

No one disputes the problem.

Only 43% of kindergarten students read at grade level, 54% of first graders, 56% of second graders and 53% of third graders.

After years of neglect, public education officials are launching plans to improve the reading skills of kindergarten, first and second grade students …

Brumley said 117,000 students – about 17% of enrollments – attend schools rated “D” or “F” by the state.

The act is called the Steve Carter Literacy Program.

Twice a day, we’ll send you the headlines of the day. Register today.

Carter was elected to State House in 2007, where he served three terms, including chairman of the House Education Committee.

Some longtime friends of the late lawmaker wondered why the state couldn’t do more, especially as public schools are receiving around $ 4 billion from three rounds of federal aid to help fight the pandemic of coronavirus.

Rep. Scott McKnight, R-Baton Rouge and sponsor of the bill, said on Tuesday he had exchanged messages with Brumley but had not told him about the Superintendent’s plan.

McKnight said he knew from the start that it would be difficult to shell out dollars for the reading initiative.

In sudden turnaround, legislature approves aid to fight Louisiana's dismal reading rates

State lawmakers approved spending $ 2 million to tackle Louisiana’s alarming reading problem for its youngest students, in part because a …

“But I felt it was important to set the schedule,” he said. “We hope to get some money in the years to come to start snacking.”

The money Brumley plans to use for tutoring is part of the 10% set aside of federal dollars going into the state.

Local school districts get 90% of the money and Brumley said in June he was ordering school systems to prioritize literacy.

Reading problems in Louisiana have lasted for generations.

However, the pandemic has complicated literacy and other long-standing challenges for public schools after 18 months of upheaval in the classroom.

“The current health crisis and weather events have caused an unprecedented disruption in the education of students across Louisiana,” the department said in documents related to the tutoring effort.

“As school systems resume teaching, they must plan for the unfinished learning that students experienced in the wake of the pandemic and hurricanes. “

Source link

]]> 0
Pandora Trust Disclosures – Less Fraud Than Expected Tue, 05 Oct 2021 18:14:27 +0000

The new WikiLeaks-style disclosures and “revelations” about offshore and domestic “secret trust” agreements will reveal a large number of legitimate and perfectly legal family planning agreements that are typically established for non-tax purposes by US taxpayers and non-Americans.

The asset protection trust

It is perfectly legal and it is the right of any US taxpayer to establish an irrevocable trust in an offshore jurisdiction which may offer legal arrangements that are not available or considered to be as reliable in the United States.

For example, in Private Letter Ruling 200944002, which was issued to a taxpayer requesting specific tax advice on the proposed transfer to an Alaskan asset protection trust, the person wanted to place assets in an irrevocable trust as gift using part of his estate. tax exemption so that the assets placed under the trust, as well as the future income and growth thereof, can be held for family members without being subject to federal inheritance tax in the same manner as these Trusts are usually established in the home state where the settlor / contributor lives.

In this situation, Alaska was one of the few states in 2009 to allow the establishment of irrevocable trusts that can benefit the settlor / contributor without allowing their creditors to access the trust. While the creditors of a contributor to a trust can access the trust and the trustee can make distributions for that contributor, the estate tax law considers the trust to be owned by the contributor and therefore taxable on the death of the contributor. contributor.

We learned from the 2009 private letter decision that the IRS understands that a contributor could donate to an irrevocable trust that would benefit them if and when needed, but could still be excluded for the purposes of protection against losses. creditors.

Full faith and credit clause

It would work well for a person who resides in Alaska and creates this type of trust, but the rules for creditor protection are not as clear when a person residing in a state that does not recognize asset protection trusts (like New York, California, or Florida) creates a trust in Alaska for this purpose. The reason this is not clear is that the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution generally states that a state court must give “full credit” and follow the judgment of a court of another state, unless it is clearly wrong. .

As a result, no one can be sure that Florida or Alaska law should apply if a Floridian establishes an asset protection trust in Alaska and is then sued by another Floridian for an incident in Florida. There is support for the proposition that Alaska law should still apply in determining whether a creditor could seize the Alaska trust, but we have no test cases that have gone to the appeal level. on this subject.

The offshore trust

For this reason, it is safer for U.S. taxpayers who do this type of conventional planning to use a trust company located in an offshore jurisdiction, such as Nevis, Belize, or the Cook Islands, which have special legislation to help secure. that individuals anywhere in the world can establish a trust there without any creditors that arise later on reaching the trust.

Offshore trusts are “disregarded” for income tax purposes under Article 684 of the Tax Code, so all income of the trust is considered income of the settlor (s). , and therefore reportable and taxable on Form 1040, Personal Income Tax Return. . This results in a situation where there are no savings or income tax costs other than following the proper reporting and normal tax rules that would generally apply.

In addition to tax planning purposes, every U.S. citizen has the right to set up a financial structure that will exclude creditors who do not exist and are not expected at the time the structure is established, and some states allow the creation of such structures even after the arrival of a creditor on the scene.

Just as almost all states have a law that protects a number of categories of assets from creditors, US nationals have the right to use offshore laws by creating offshore trusts, and have been doing so for decades, if not centuries. .

It is therefore not surprising that a large number of well-advised American individuals have established and maintained offshore trusts and similar structures, and that the vast majority of these structures are fully income tax compliant.

In particular, the tax law requires extensive disclosure of the assets and activities of offshore trusts to the IRS, and there are significant penalties for non-disclosure. You can read about this by looking at IRS Form 3520, IRS Form 3520-A, and Treasury Department Form FinCEN 114 (FBAR Form) and reading the related instructions.

Sometimes the guardianship under these trusts established by US taxpayers will consist of a foreign trust company and a domestic trust company acting as co-trustees, to avoid having to deposit as a foreign trust. Under these “hybrid trusts,” the trust agreement provides that the US-based co-trustee will have control of the trust’s assets and decision-making and that US law will apply to the trust. , unless or until the US Trustee resigns. This avoids having to file a Form 3520, 3520A, or FBAR when it is properly written, implemented and operated. All of this is permitted under section 7701 (a) (30) (E) of the IRC, which defines a “foreign trust” and describes what Treasury regulations call the “control test” and the “control test”. court ”to determine whether a trust is a foreign trust.

Confidentiality in estate planning

Because of the above, it is painful to see a presumption or assumption that individuals and families who have formed and maintained offshore trusts or trusts in national jurisdictions are breaking the law or acting illegally for any reason. It is especially painful to see that reputable trust companies with which our law firm and other law firms have worked for several decades see their files and their clients’ affairs disclosed indiscriminately as if they were regularly involved. in some kind of financial or tax fraud, which is certainly not the case from what we have seen and experienced over the past 30 years.

International bankers and trust companies are well aware of the importance of operating ethically and accurately, and of protecting the confidentiality of client information, except for government disclosures and reports required under numerous laws. which they must navigate and with which they must comply.

Regulatory conformity

As for non-U.S. Individuals and families who have placed their assets in international trusts, which now typically include trusts in Nevada and South Dakota, the vast majority of these arrangements also comply with U.S. tax and must be compliant in the country of the constituent. / origin of the contributor.

It is generally against US law for a US professional to participate in violating the law of a foreign country. There is nothing wrong, however, in helping a foreign individual to establish a trust or trusts which may be immune from being attacked by creditors, or to form and operate trusts which can leverage. foreign tax laws that allow trusts formed outside the jurisdiction of the owner’s place of residence to facilitate the avoidance or deferral of income tax.

For example, many foreign countries have tax laws that essentially provide that only income from inside the foreign country is taxable, and that income from outside the foreign country that is held under special trusts. will not be taxable unless or until they are reintroduced into the country. country in which the grantor / contributor resides.

In fact, such trusts were commonly used by American citizens until the early 1960s, when the United States began to pass legislation prohibiting American taxpayers from engaging in such strategies, in part due to the efforts of the United States. of President John F. Kennedy, whose family used these trusts for tax avoidance and other purposes before he became president.

Now, U.S. companies can still engage in similar strategies with respect to foreign income that is earned under structures where a foreign company known as a “blocker” is not subject to the tax. tax in the country where it is incorporated, so that income is not taxed before it is imported into the United States.

Transparency against harassment

Journalists who have found and disclosed sensitive and confidential information about large numbers of individuals and families around the world can act nobly and with good intentions to expose tax evasion and crime, which undoubtedly exists to some extent. in the international arena, but at the same time, they disrupt private families and lives that are in full compliance with all US and international laws, and are exposed to possible financial and even personal harm due to assumptions and d insinuations that may be completely incorrect and unwarranted.

This will encourage more U.S. taxpayers to resort to smaller trust companies, law firms, or other persons or entities that provide foreign trustee services to reduce the likelihood of them being exposed to exposure. massive public of this nature.

In some cases, it is not uncommon for foreign individuals and families to entrust assets to a trust that will not be accessible to the government of the country they live in for fear of improper or illegal retaliation / foreclosure. In fact, a provision in a trust agreement that indicates a government reversal of the jurisdiction in which the trustee is located is called a “Cuba clause”.

US citizens can continue to use appropriately formed, funded and declared offshore trusts for legitimate tax planning and creditor protection purposes when the circumstances are right. Unfortunately, they risk having their personal information exposed to the general public in such circumstances, and being subjected to unnecessary criticism or mockery as a result.

Source link

]]> 0
The Toms River family in a race against time to save their home Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:29:48 +0000

In Toms River, the Stamatogiannis family have had their fair share of challenges and now the son is asking for last minute help to save their home.

Listen to Shannon Holly mornings 94.3 The Point and download our free 94.3 The Point app.

Heather Stamatogiannis is a widow, mother of three and struggles with the disease herself, on top of that she risks losing the family home. Heather lost her husband over Christmas when she was only 32 years old. She was suddenly a widow and was now raising three children on her own, one of whom was severely disabled. Her daughter, Brianna, suffers from Down syndrome, epilepsy and Graves’ disease and suffers up to 100 seizures per day. She is in a wheelchair and partially paralyzed. Heather, the mom, struggles with systemic lupus and fibromyalgia herself, keeping her from working.

Now, even if the house is paid off, the family risks losing their house due to a land tax lien that has been sold. If they don’t get the 25K they need for the privilege by October 15, they will be kicked out. That’s why her son Andrew took action with a GoFundMe campaign to help her mother. The Social Security disability insurance Heather receives will not be enough to pay for the tax lien. Andrew says his mother has always taken such good care of him, and now he’s trying to save her.

Their home is a ranch where the family has lived for over twenty years, it was built by her husband, John before he died in 2009 of pancreatic cancer.

The couple met when she worked for him as a waitress at the Plaza Diner in Lakehurst.

Andrew said they tried many avenues before turning to GoFundMe for help. He said that if he could help his mother get through this tax lien refund crisis, he had a plan in place to make sure she never found herself in this situation again. It appeared during GoFundMe’s last check that they were almost halfway there, but time is running out.

Those who wish to help can contribute to GoFundMe here.

You can read more about the dire situation of this family here.

WATCH: Some of the photos that capture the historic year 2020 was

Source link

]]> 0
Battle Ground votes against “medical freedom” ordinance Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:49:59 +0000

Following a heated exchange, Battle Ground City Council on Monday rejected a proposed “medical freedom” ordinance in a 4-2 vote.

Council members Brian Munson and Shauna Walters voted in favor of the ordinance; Mayor Adrian Cortes, Deputy Mayor Phillip Johnson and council members Shane Bowman and Cherish DeRochers voted against.

DeRochers said she supports medical freedom and would have been inclined to vote for the prescription if the negative effects had not been so severe.

Bowman and Johnson were particularly critical of the ordinance and Munson for proposing it. Both accused Munson of political demagoguery and of campaigning from the podium.

“It has nothing to do with the citizens of Battle Ground,” Bowman said. “The people who elected us are paying for it, so that we can play political games from the platform. This is unacceptable.

Bowman and Johnson also aimed to have the city spend taxpayer dollars to hire an outside legal advisor and use the time of the city attorney and city staff to research the order.

The city hired Yakima’s lawyer Kirk Ehlis to review the order and provide legal advice. Ehlis said the ordinance could create legal liability for the city and individual council members who would not be covered by the city’s insurance pool.

Ehlis also said, in his opinion, that Governor Jay Inslee has the legal authority to pass warrants and those warrants have the force of law.

City attorney Christine Hayes agreed the city and council could be open to legal action if the ordinance is passed. She also said the city would have to comply with all laws to receive federal funding, which the ordinance could put at risk. In addition, the city could be fined by agencies like OSHA, which could impose fines of up to $ 14,000 per day.

“I want to see what my countrymen are willing to bet,” Johnson said of the city’s $ 44 million annual budget. “We have already spent around $ 10,000. “

Despite their votes in favor of the ordinance, Munson and Walters made little comment during the meeting.

The council will then meet at 7 p.m. on October 18. All meetings take place on Zoom.

Source link

]]> 0
Jefferson City Council votes to demolish four dilapidated buildings Tue, 05 Oct 2021 02:11:18 +0000


Jefferson City Council voted Monday to award a contract to demolish four “dangerous” buildings, some in the East Capitol Avenue neighborhood.

Council members voted unanimously to pass the bill.

The city will demolish all properties at 410 E. Hess Way, 320 E. Miller St., 417 E. Capitol Ave. and 528 E. Capitol Ave./202 Marshall St.

Mid-Mo Earth Movers presented the lowest offer at $ 147,609, according to documents provided to the board.

The city says the buildings are being removed because they pose a health risk. The city held a hearing to reach this conclusion.

City property maintenance and law enforcement supervisor David Helmick said the homes are qualified for demolition because they are in stages of decay, deterioration or damage. are structurally unhealthy and unhealthy. Helmick said the process of demolishing properties begins with a phone call to the city’s property maintenance department from firefighters, police departments and sometimes family or higher departments.

Shana Enloe, a resident of the town of Jefferson, said she thought the demolition of the buildings was a good idea. Enloe said, “They can build really nice apartments or houses that people can live in. They can make this block a little bit nicer.”

The city will try to get refunds from the owners after the demolitions and will issue a tax lien to get the money back if the owner doesn’t pay.

City administrator Steve Crowell said in council documents that the properties are unoccupied.

Source link

]]> 0
Department of Health discusses applicability of HIPAA to COVID-19 vaccination information Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:13:06 +0000

The Federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued guidance on the applicability of HIPAA to COVID-19 vaccination information, directly addressing a number of misconceptions about when HIPAA regulates or no disclosure of an individual’s COVID-19 vaccination status. . Here are five key takeaways from orientation.

“The privacy rule does not prohibit any person (for example, an individual or entity such as a business), including HIPAA-covered entities and business associates, from inquiring whether an individual has received a particular vaccine. , including COVID-19 vaccines. “- HHS (Sep 30, 2021)

1. HIPAA only regulates Covered Entities and Business Partners.

The guidelines reiterate that HIPAA only applies to covered entities (health plans, health care providers that perform standard electronic transactions, and health care clearinghouses) and their associated providers. HIPAA does not generally apply to employers, restaurants, stores, schools, and places of entertainment. Additionally, HIPAA does not apply to the disclosure by individuals of their own immunization information.

2. HIPAA does not prohibit Covered Entities or Business Associates from asking questions about vaccinations.

HIPAA restricts how covered entities and business associates can use and disclose Protected Health Information (PHI) – HIPAA does not prohibit anyone from request if anyone has been vaccinated. For example, HIPAA does not prohibit a covered entity from asking if patients or visitors have been vaccinated against COVID-19. However, patient immunization information is PHI and HIPAA regulates how the covered entity uses and discloses this information once received.

3. HIPAA does not apply to employee information.

With regard to employers in particular, the guide notes that HIPAA does not apply to health information in employee records, even when the employer is a covered entity or business partner. This means that the employee vaccination records that an organization keeps as an employer are not regulated by HIPAA. HIPAA also does not apply to employees questioned about their own immunization status or who disclose their own immunization status. Although there may be other federal and state laws that are involved in these situations, HIPAA does not apply. For example, see the EEOC guidelines “What You Need to Know About COVID-19 and ADA, Rehabilitation Law and Other EEO Laws”.

4. Entities covered by HIPAA do not always need permission to disclose information about vaccination.

The general rule under HIPAA is that a covered entity needs the individual’s permission to use or disclose PHI, unless an exception applies. 45 CFR § 164.502 (a). The HHS guidelines summarize scenarios in which HIPAA allows a covered entity to disclose an individual’s immunization status without the individual’s permission, including, without limitation, (i) to a plan to health when necessary to obtain payment for immunization, (ii) to public health authorities, and (iii) when required by law.

Note, however, that such disclosures may be further restricted by applicable state law. The guidelines also state that the covered entity will generally need permission to disclose the person’s immunization status to entertainment venues, cruise ships, airlines and similar types of disclosures.

5. Healthcare providers in HIPAA-covered entities may disclose immunization information to employers without authorization only in specific circumstances.

Covered entities need permission to disclose immunization information to an individual’s employer, unless the disclosure meets all of the following conditions:

  1. The covered entity is a health care provider who provides health care to the person at the request of the employer to perform an assessment relating to the medical surveillance of the workplace (for example, monitoring the spread of COVID -19 within the workforce) or to assess whether the person suffers from a work-related illness or injury;

  2. RPS disclosed are the results of a work-related illness or injury or work-related medical surveillance;

  3. The employer needs the results to comply with their legal obligations under OSHA, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or state laws with a similar purpose; and

  4. The Covered Entity has provided written notice to the Individual that PHI related to workplace health surveillance and work-related illnesses will be disclosed to the Employer through one of the HIPAA-authorized notification methods.

45 CFR § 164.512 (b) (1) (v). If any of these conditions are not met, covered entities will generally need the employee’s permission to disclose their immunization status to the employer. Additionally, as noted above, such disclosures may be further restricted by applicable state law.

For reference, the following table summarizes some of the examples provided by HHS in the guide:

Fact model

Does HIPAA apply?

Covered Entity or Business Associate Uses or Discloses Patient / Health Plan Member Vaccine Information


Covered entity or business associate asks if person has been vaccinated

No (although the use or disclosure of this information, whether the person is a patient or a plan member, is regulated by HIPAA)

Individual A asks individual B if individual B is vaccinated


Person discloses their own immunization status


A school, employer, store, restaurant or place of entertainment asks someone about their immunization status


The person asks their doctor if the doctor is vaccinated


An individual asks the company if its staff are vaccinated


Employer requires employee to provide vaccination documents


Source link

]]> 0
ESG is “mission critical”. Paul, Can Weiss enter law school? Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:50:00 +0000
  • The firm launches an ESG institute with UC Berkeley Law
  • He plans to involve more law schools in ESG research

The names of companies and law firms shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this functionality as we continue to test and develop in beta. We appreciate comments, which you can provide using the comments tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) – Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison have teamed up with the University of California’s Berkeley School of Law to launch a one-of-a-kind research initiative focused on ESG – the legal field in full swing growth of the environment, society and governance issues.

As the firm’s first ESG and Law Institute partner school, students and associate professors at the Business and Society Institute at Berkeley Law will work with Paul Weiss lawyers to conduct research, organize panel discussions, and bring together opinion leaders in the ESG field. Paul, Weiss will be offering two annual scholarships of $ 25,000 to Berkeley students involved in the new institute in the hope that they will help establish a cohort of young lawyers who are familiar with the many aspects of ESG practice. The firm plans to expand the institute and involve more law schools in the future.

The Berkeley partnership also reflects Paul, Weiss’ recent expansion into the Bay Area. The firm opened an office in Northern California in July 2020. It now has 17 attorneys.

Institute director Dave Curran, who is also co-chair of Paul, Weiss’s ESG consultancy, said the institute will tackle the big picture, the “existential” questions surrounding ESG. in a way that lawyers advising clients on day-to-day matters do not have the ability to contemplate. And that will bring academic rigor to the conversation around ESG, he said.

“We need a way to bring together thought leadership at a high and broad level that I can’t just do by leading a practice,” Curran said. “We also need to involve a wider community, including academics. “

Amelia Miazad, faculty director of the Business in Society Institute at Berkeley Law, said she envisions the new partnership with Paul, Weiss bridging the gap between theoretical discussions about ESG and what’s really going on within companies . Current ESG research tends to fall into a very practical category, such as business case studies, or very theoretical law journal articles.

“What’s exciting here is that we can do something that is really designed for executives and professionals, but still takes advantage of that academic rigor and that research,” Miazad said.

The research, polls and discussions produced by the Paul, Weiss ESG and the Law Institute will be publicly available, Curran said. The field is changing rapidly, he said, noting that Paul Weiss was the first large company to launch a dedicated ESG practice, in March 2020.

“ESG has been around forever,” Curran said. “The difference over the past two years is that lawyers recognize that companies that make obligations such as social or environmental commitments must actually meet those commitments. “

Paul, Weiss and its chairman Brad Karp have spoken on social and political issues such as marriage equality, voter protection and reproductive rights. But the company has also been targeted by critics who say its portrayal of fossil fuel customers makes it complicit in climate change.

Curran and Miazad both said they hoped the new institute would encourage law schools to incorporate more ESG training into their curriculum. Beyond Berkeley Law, few law schools offer ESG courses other than an occasional tutorial course, Curran said.

“We want the legal industry to recognize that it is essential for lawyers to fully understand ESG and its intersection with the law,” said Curran. “We need the students to think about it. It is the fastest growing specialty that no one knows.

Read more:

We put these ESG lawyers to the test

Big Law is betting ESG trend is here to stay with new moves from Orrick, Seyfarth

Source link

]]> 0